▶ Your Answer :
Many people think when a budget deficit of the
government occurs, it should reduce the public transit spending or increase the
tax income. But I believe that the government suffering from its budget deficit
should reduce the funding of the art first of all. There are some reasons for that,
first reason is that art do not provide any profit to government although the
reduction in art funding has been criticized by many considering that it has
many potential asset and benefit. And the other reason is that most public do
not want government to invest into art related issues when the government’s
fund are going to bankrupt. To begin with, the government should reduce the
amount of money it pays on art when their budget deficit occurs, because art
can provide any profit to government. It seems to be clear that art is valuable
asset of the nation so it can bring many beneficial things to government, but
It is also obvious that art cannot be served as a helpful existence to the
government suffering from its budget deficit. For example, when economic crisis
occurs, and there is no money in the government bank account, the government should
take shift action and invest its residual money into some useful things to
recover its economy by reducing the funding of art. So, I think that the government
should reduce its budget for art first when its budget deficit occurs.
On the top of that, the public do not want government
to spend its money on art related issues when the government are going to
bankrupt. it is difficult for government to earn the public’s supports without
recovering in its economy. For instance, People really don’t want to enjoy the
famous singer’s concert or musical with being hungry. In this regard, I strongly
believe that the government should reduce its budget for art first when its
budget deficit occurs.
To sum up, the government suffering from its budget deficit
should reduce its funding for art first for the following reasons, firstly, art
cannot provide any prompt profit to government and secondly, the public do not
want government to spend its money on art. |