▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer
argues that the many possible sources that has have been suggested to explain the
origin of ashen light of Venus have problems. This contradicts the reading
passage’s claim that the origin can be explained by those sources.
First,
the lecturer argues that a chemical process in Venus’s atmosphere is unable to
cause the ashen light. This is because the recombined carbon dioxide after the process
produces very faint light, which makes it very hard to detect the light by
simple telescopes. This casts doubt the reading passage’s claim that glow is
caused by the chemical process.
Next,
the lecturer claims that the sunlight reflected off clouds cannot be the origin of
the glow. This is because the ashen light occurs very rarely. But, the Venus is
reflected constantly by the sun light. This counters the reading passage’s
claim that the reflected sunlight by the clouds is the possible source.
Finally,
the lecturer points out the theory that glow is aurora is not true. The aurora occurs when plasma is pulled in by magnetic field. However, the planet does not
have the magnetic field. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the aurora are the cause for the ashen light. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 대채로 서로 대립되는 리딩과 리스닝의 정보들을 잘 서술 하신 거 같습니다. 하지만 제가 리딩과 리스닝을 보지 못한 상태이기 때문에, 혹시 리딩과 리스닝을 확인 하실 때 빠진 정보가 있으면 더 넣어주시면 좋을 거 같습니다. 또한 리스닝의 정보에 비해 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족합니다. 리딩에서 빠진 정보들이 있다면 서술해주시면 더 좋은 에세이가 될 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|