▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage there is ample
support for the author's claim that the rapidly collapse of Hohokam was
explained. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a
rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that Hohokam people
did not migrate to the other land because of floods. Floods were the fairly
common occasion in the Hohokam society. In 889, the flood occurred was discovered and
Hohokam people well recovered from it. They made channel system to adapt the flood
situations. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that floods made
people to disperse to new lands. to migrate to the other land because of lethal
floods.
Next the professor argues that Hohokam society was did not destroyed destroy due to foreign diseases from
European explorers. Spain reached in America until in 1492. However, Hohokam
disappeared several decades ago from then. There was no evidence that people in Hohokam were was widely killed due to no burying and cremation. If they had been killed, there
must have been discovered mass graves and cremation cite. This casts doubt on
the reading passage's claim that native people in Hohokam was not died by
infections.
Third the professor insists that there is no proof
that Hohokam people resisted against leaders and made conflicts. There was no ruling
class in that time. The reason is that tombstones were not discovered. In
addition Hohokam civilization is was only in oral history by Indian, so it is was not
always reliable. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that Hohokam
civilization was scattered because of the internal conflicts.
Writing 0–30 score scale Limited (1-16) Fair (17-23) ✓ Good (24–30)
홍수, 전염병, 내부갈등이라는 세 가지 요소에 맞게 내용을 묶어주신 부분이 좋았어요. 하지만 아직 완전한 요약문이라 보기에는 불필요한 설명이 많이 섞여 있는 것 같아요. 꼭 필요한 detail만 남겨서 정리할 수 있게끔 내용을 더 다듬어주시면 좋을 것 같아요. 수일치나 시제, 태, be동사/do동사 구분하는 부분 등에서 문법오류가 눈에 띄니까 이 부분도 신경써주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다~!! |