Art is fragile; architecture is not. Paintings and sculptures speak to the quiet as well as the strife-ridden aspects of
modern life. They only thrive in a carefully nurtured context-hospitable human spaces that invite lingering and
revisiting-which is why the genius of the best curators is in their eye for juxtaposition and presentation as much as
it is in scholarship and acquisition. Architecture needs to be strong and confident; but the instant museum
architecture becomes ostentatiously strong and overconfident, the art is going to wither. The Tate Modern is a
building that will not stop speaking and let us attend to the art.
For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
The passage implies that a problem with "ostentatiously strong and overconfident" architecture for art museums is that viewers will
Aavoid certain museums that they otherwise would have visited
Blinger excessively in order to appreciate the building`s architecture
Cfind themselves distracted from paying attention to the art
For the following question, consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
The passage points to which of the following as criteria by which art museum curators should be evaluated?
AThe aesthetic context that they provide for any individual artwork
BThe social and cultural issues that their collections address
CThe artworks that they obtain for their museum collections
정답은 각각 C와 A,C입니다.
일단 본문 자체가 이해가 안됐어요.. ㅠㅠ 감사합니다