▶ Your Answer :
In this magazine, the author argues that
the Clearview should be a top choice for a place for retirees. Despite the
possibility that the author’s recommendation might produce predicted results of
Clearview being the top choice, the argument lacks solid evidence assumptions
and does not justify it convincingly. Therefore, more evidence is required to
strengthen and evaluate the claim.
First, the author needs to provide a
concrete evidence on having a wonderful natural beauty and a consistent
climate. It is possible that much more splendid natural beauty is located at
different places, and thus retirees prefer there. Also, it should be made clear
weather the weather is constantly rain or always cold or snow. If the weather
is constantly bad, Clearwater may not be a best choice for retirement.
Second, the author needs to add a solid
evidence on the housing costs in Clearview being fallen during the past year.
Even if it is true, the housing costs in present year can go up, which will act
as a downfall reason against Clearview being a best choice. Moreover, even if
the housing costs being still fallen in the present year, the costs itself can
be significantly higher than the average of the state. In addition, it is
likely that although it may be true that the taxes is lower than those in
neighboring towns, it may be comparatively high than the average taxes of the
state.
Lastly, a concrete evidence is needed on
the soundness of the conclusion that Clearview expects many new programs. In
all likelihood, promise the mayor gave may not become true. Even if the new programs
improve schools, streets, and public services, these programs may not be wanted
for retirees. Programs needed for retirees may be such as spa, golf place, and
other relaxing programs rather than the programs explained above. Moreover, the
argument that Clearview expect excellent health care because the number of
physicians is greater than the national average need to be reconsider. In all likelihood,
the size of the physicians may not guarantee the quality of health care. The
physicians can be novices and thus does not make Clearwater the best choice for
retirees.
In sum, the author relies too heavily on
assumptions which need to be verified. Consequently, supplementary proof should
be considered for a satisfactory assessment of the recommendation. To bolster
the argument, the author needs to revaluate the evidence. |