Your Answer ▼
It
is a common belief that the personal data of brutal offenders should be protected. However,
there is a more persuasive argument that every data of culprits should is supposed to
be open to the public.
On
other hands, a lot of countries ban to open forbid from opening the public about personal materials
of culprits to the public because some people believe that privacy is should be a priority
after criminals are released from jail. If they are their personal information is has shown to the
public, they would not be able to have a normal life even if they were reformed. In fact,
most of the criminals who have already been released are getting suffering from the criminal
sensor, which called electronic anklet. Moreover, they are it would be quite difficult to get
a new job especially at the company and public institution. In Korea, for
instance, they try to hide the criminal's personal data to the public in
addition, there is no way to find the offender's face and detail with the normal
method. (이 내용은 위에서 하고자 하는 말을 전혀 뒷받침해주지 못합니다. 취업 관련 어려움을 겪는 사람들에 관해 적어주시든지 해주셔야 해요.)
Nevertheless,
it is more important that to prevent crime by showing the personal detail of
intense criminals to the official. As a matter of fact, there are so many second
crimes. Those who are released from prison are potential criminals. According
to a poll, a person who has been committed crime before are more likely to significantly
crime again. (이런 걸 투표로 조사하지 않습니다. 통계, 연구 결과로 하는 게 더 자연스럽죠. '너는 출소한 뒤 다시 범죄를 저질렀니?' 라는 설문을 범죄자들에게 보내지는 않죠.) The proportion of crime by offenders is much higher than the new
crime. Furthermore, the victims should be suffering from aftereffect even criminals
have already gone to jail due to they would release from prison if they are
not under sentence of life imprisonment. (여기는 의도하신 바에 대해 댓글 주세요~)
To sum up, while it is apparent that
criminals should be protected to the public, it is undeniable that preventing the
second crime and victim's problems always should be a top priority. |