▶ Your Answer :
The crime has been occurring throughout the world due to increasing greed of people for scarce resources. To tackle to increasing the criminal rate, some people argue that there should be concrete law for dealing
with each different crimes, while other object that the personal situations should
be observed before convicting.
A government should elucidate the
punishment for being suitable with various crimes. The precise punishment can make people have a wary feeling. For example, without any relevant rules, people might
not hesitate to commit a crime. It is because there is no proper means to oppress their criminal behavior. As a government legislates a specific guideline for crime,
its occurring rate could decrease. People may behave meticulously all the time by the specific rules.
In the contrast, some people argue that the judge local court need to ponder the criminals` circumstance. It is plausible that offenders do not intend to commit a crime. Sometimes we could face to unavoidable situation which we should counter to local law. For example, In the LA riot which is triggered by black
people in 1980s, some Korean fired shot to them to protect their families and
asset, killing a robber and wounding them. The US court, however, relieved the punishment to the Korean who murdered in that incident. That is because, the judge admitted that they were in the unavoidable situation to protect their precious thing.
In my opinion, I believe that people need
to ponder the individual situation before conviction to criminals, because they
might have some difficult situation which cannot escape.
In conclusion, setting a precise punishment
would relieve the increasing criminal rate, because people would always concern
about the strict and fixed rule. Furthermore, people should ponder the
different situation of individual before judging them. |