At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some countries have a bigger population of young aged adults than old people. Also, one can see that it has both merits and demerits in this circumstance. However, I believe merits affect to countries more.
To begin with, one of the drawbacks is a country which has a bigger scale of young people could fall into some mistakes that their ancestors already did before. Most of perfectly matures are able to teach the young about surviving tips in a tough life since they have been lived long and they know that what they should be doing or not for developing their future. Furthermore, the advice from these old people can be led the young to the right achievement. Though, if there are not enough people who can teach the young, a country composing of a large number of young adults could be confused to improve for the future.
By the way, there are powerful advantages in that country. The most affectable good point among them is the probability of growth would be quite high. It can be explained by an example that some countries such as South Korea and Japan which have been called the countries having little growth potential since their newborn baby rates are so low. On this point, some countries which include a relatively larger young generation compared to older ones have many chances to develop their countries because they have a large number of population in young adults who can create new idea and surprising founding more.
In conclusion, there is a drawback of little chances to get some advice from older people. Nevertheless, regard this situation such as South Korea reality and the point that young matures have more than creativity for improving their country than the old aged, I think advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
정말 초조해지는 것 같아요 ㅠㅠ 그래도 열심히 노력하고 있어요