Some people assume that artists have to be supported by the governments while the others argue that alternative sources should be funded. These views have both advantages and disadvantages, however i personally assume alternative sources should be funded.
It is fact that people who are artists as their job are hard to make money enough to sustain their lives. If they once become famous, they will absolutely earn both fame and wealth, however, they are generally struggled by the economical factors. For instance, there are already a lot of talented people to the music or art over the world, but they gave up to continue their dream due to the money. so if the governments provide them financial help, these artists can focus on their work. Possibly, the nations will have more number of greater artists than right now.
On the other hands, I personally assume that there are more negativity. First, the standard of the people who are artists as their job is actually not certain because they are usually not officially hired or belonged to any corporations or governments. Moreover, from the perspective of the society, practically, artists are not that productive for the economy. Artist is a kind of job for the entertainment for the people, however, if these people are multiplied too much, it will possibly affect the national economy negatively.
In conclusion, providing the economical support from the government to the artists can make people who have dream of being artist continue their dream, nevertheless, i assume that the standard of people choosing artist as their job is not too certain, and it can also affect the national economy negatively.