Your Answer ▼ It is a common belief that imposing a fee of using vehicles at traffic congestion time should does not be allowed, even though it contributes to air pollution. However, I firmly believe that imposing a fee this would do a lot of good because it could help to protect environments and decrease traffic jams.
To begin with, implementing a rush hour fee would ease traffic congestion, diminishing some of the pollution in the atmosphere. Charging people will make them less likely to drive to work. Instead, they would opt to use alternative means of transportation. This is important because being stuck in traffic also adds significantly to the emission of pollutants. Moreover, enforcing a fee is not only simple, but it works well. In London, for example, the government introduced a congestion fee several years ago. As a result, many people stared to carpool, walk, or use public transportation rather than drive to work. The less vehicles on roads released traffic congestions, and pollution levels have been going down ever since.
On top of that, the revenue from those charges can be used to fund environmentally friendly projects. Governments will use a the fee to make more clearly the city more clear (어순을 과하게 꼬아서 작성하실 필요는 없습니다.). In Stockholm, for instance, the city administration has been able to plant trees and flowers alongside roads with the funds from a rush hour regulation. This vegetation adds to the beauty of the landscape, but more importantly, improves overally (일단 overally 라는 표현은 없고, 또한, 여기에 관해서 조금만 더 구체적으로 설명해주세요~정확히 뭐가 나아진다는 건지 정도는 알려주셔야 합니다.). In effect, tax revenues from a rush hour fee can do much to alleviate the polluted air.
To sum up, (여기에 부과하다 등의 의미를 가진 동사를 넣어주세요.) the small amount of fee for drivers who are using their vehicles in a rush hours decrease traffic craffic and can help maintainly (이 표현 역시 존재하지 않으며, 추가적으로 무엇을 유지한다는 것인지에 대한 설명이 필요합니다.). For these reasons, charging the people would help to the earth and society. |