It is contentious to whether to open information like scientific research to public as a source or not.
People who disagree to share information free believe that there is potentional importance in some kind of
information. However, it may be argued that better world will be made if the information become free source.
To begin with, sharing information can lead people from all around the world to become even smarter as
they can learn freely from databases that some have been shared. Limited access to business and academic
world is resulting more people to become stuck in their academics because they do not have moderate
answers to follow.
On the other hand, scientific researches and other kinds of information cannot be opened freely. Firstly, as the
information was gathered precisely and carefully by experts, it cannot be spread among the internet without any
costs. Also, as it is thorough and reliable to use as a sample answer or model for their study, it need to be
paid in order to pay for efforts of the information owner and to keep 'copyright'.
In my honest opinion, I believe that information should be paid by people who want to use it. Not only because
it is trust-worthy content but also it is expert's own copyrighted information.
In conclusion, to educate people without any cost is one of the reasons why some people believe information
including researches in various subjects should be opened for public. However, keeping owner's copyright as
it is detailed content outweighs educating people freely. Thus, it is better not to make information as a free
source.