▶ Your Answer : As the process of development of the cities, theri traditional building also changed into the new ones. Therefore, some people concern about that it could lose one's tradition customs as extinct of the historical building. Although under this circumstance, I will explain the both side of the replace of the historical building into the modern building and give my opinion.
To begin with, as preserve the historical building, people can learn about the history of their living ares. For example, althouth I born in Incheon, always felt about my ignorance of my hometown accroding to the development of the international city. Therefore, I only remembered around my home is modern building that composed of glass of theri superficial. In addition, because another historical building also destroyed by goverment because of their plans of refresh the residental environment, many inhabitant in Incheon still do not know about the traditional records of their hometown. In this regard, historical building should preserve to maintain its custom.
On the other hand, to improve the residental environments historical building should replace into the new ones. First of all, the building which have lasted in 60 years has a crisis that collapsed itself. In addition, around the old towns have a capability to commit a crime because of their poor atmosphere. In other ward, some of the cities which are old hace to develop into the new town for build a new building in the area where it located originally for their residents. That is, historical building have to changed by the new ones for develonping process.
In conclusion, as preserve the historical building in some area, people who are inhabitant have an oppotunity to learn a chronogical order of this place. Although I think that the convenient living environment is far outweigh the historical building, so traditional building should transfered into the new building as soon as possible. |