Your Answer ▼
Modern society presses young people to study at school and succeed academically. With this pressure, all young students study same things such as math, science and english regardless of their interest and talent. Even some people believe that non-academic subject is unnecessary at school and it is just waste of time. However, I totally disagree that these subjects should be removed from the syllabus and children have to concentrate on only academic subjects.
First of all, academical success is not the only way to success in life. Children can succeed in non-academic fields such as sports and cook. Each student has different interest and talent so what they can achieve well is also different. Thus, it is very important to find what they want to be and what they are interested in when they are young. However, if non-academic subjects are removed at schools, children have no chance to find their aptitudes and they can lose their ways even though they go to good schools. It is actually happening that many young people wander and waste time after going to university.
Furthermore, book is not the only method to study and there are many things that they can not learn on books. For example, children can learn teamwork and sociality by playing sports with classmates and physical activity is good for health and physical strength that can be connected to their academical outcomes. Also, non-academic class such as drawing and making something is helpful for creativity and brain storming. Therefore, non-academic classes are essential for young student’s development in the diverse fields.
As a result, despite of the social pressure of academical success, schools have to try to provide many courses that students can find their talent and their own ways. Furthermore, They keep in mind that non-academic subjects are the extension of the study at the classroom and children can learn a lot of things that they can not through just books. |