▶ Your Answer :
In current society, as crimes have vaired and the severity of violence has increased, some people argue that police officers should carry guns to protect societies and decline the level of violence. I agree with the contention, and this eassy will explain my reasons for this.
To begin with. there is no doubt that police officers carrying guns alleviates the intensity of violent offense as well as decreases crime rates. In other words, since guns are deadly weapons, police force armed with guns would surely deciline and limit the motivation of various criminal attempts. On top of that, fundamentally, the limited motivation not only leads crimials to give up the planned crimes or lower the level of violence, but also it prevents further potential criminals from committing crimes. Consequently, gun ownership of police forces should be considered as the one of the greatest way for lowering crime rates.
Another statement which supports the inclination is that gun is an essential tool for police forces. To elaborate, if police officers are not allowed to crarry guns as their protective equipment, they would not be able to play a role as law enforcement agents who should protect innocent populace as well as public and private properties. For example, when police officers without a gun face against some criminals holding a knife or a handgun for bank robbery or threatening innocent populace to steal financial possessions, there is nothing much what poplice officers can do in order to break through the difficulties without calling for a support.
Upon cautiously looking at the aforementioned statements, I have finally reached at a conclusion that carrying guns by police officers is inevitably necessary to secure indiviuals and societies as well as decrease the level of violence. |