▶ Your Answer :
Nowadays, certain nations have concerned about how
could they boost the public’s quality of life. It is often a controversial
issue that whether the government should introduce newly developed technology
or provide non-cost education system. Personally, I think that it is much more
beneficial way to serve the free cost
education for the children because they are
the future members of society, who will lead
the country. First of all, innovation of technology can be a
major factor of country’s prosperity. Therefore, in developing countries to
enhance the overall living standard of
citizens investing much money on the technology is the best tactic in the long
term. For example, with investment of invention of new devices such as from
manless vehicle to touch screen, the public can experience convenient life style, by driving and doing an assignment
simultaneously. Thus, through the introduction of advanced technology,
government can contribute to soaring the satisfaction rate of the individual’s
life. On the other hand, as time goes by the gap between
the rich and poor will be more broadened since the usage of new devices is
limited to the wealthy. Therefore, providing
free education system will give a better influence for the nation’s
development. For instance, the children who suffer from poverty can enroll in
schools and specialize their knowledge regardless of payment for the education.
Hence, this trend facilitates the appearance of figures who will bring enormous
innovation and development of that society. As a result, focusing on the
education is much more desirable in the long term.
To sum up, it is reasonable to say that investing on
the new technology gives a huge impact on the public’s convenient life. However,
I believe that it has a tricky problem and thus education program which is free should be implemented by a
government level for the future generation.
|