Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation,such as an unsatistactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improves such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is a common believe that some critics assert that satisfying with a recent situation is a key to success for their lifestyle despite negative surroundings. On the other hand, others suggest that challenging high aims is to improve their conditions in the forseable future. Both view seem to be convincing. I will highlight those opinions and present my view.
To begin with, conforming the recent situation prevent people from chronic disease. In other way, to maintain their health, being a positive mindset is essential to sustain the rest of the life. According to a recent scientific jounanls, people who have struggled with extremly high stress is likely to get uncurable illness such as diabetic, cancer compared to people who are happy with a negative situation. This shows that the attitude for life is deeply correlated to human being's health.
Neverthless, humanbeing should keep pursuing the development of their own field. Allowing a negative situation makes people abandoned their goals, then most of them could easily give up aims when they face hardship in the middle of the life. To be more specific,The constant effort to change harsh situation can makes our society flourished and advanced more than those who do not try anything. In short, accepting any condition with laziness might bring about retardness of our society, it would utterly have negative influence on nation's economy system.
In conclusion, there is a persuasive argument that soley satisfying their conditions is conducive to get rid of their stress and maintain a good health. Considering advancement of our nation, it is undeniable that later's view outweigh the advantage of first view.