Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restriction on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion ? |
The modernizationa and globalization of our socirty is now getting more and more creativeness oriented so that the freedom of expression in arts are now being vastely expanded. However over expressed art contents somtimes evoke social problems even though artists insist they are just only results of their creativeness.
In the past when mass-media was limited only to off line and space, people who loved arts had to go to museums, gallaries and theaters to enjoy their interests in art. It was very simple to keep people out of harmful effect of art, if there was any, because simply putting restrictions on enterance to the art centers could cut the exposure of contents to people. Then, people had no choice but to make their own small society to enjoy arts, regardless it was harmful or not, only among themselves.
Now that we have easy accesses to all kind of mess media thesedays, the art contents are floating everywhere through lines such as cable TV and internet. Although there are some tools to keep kids from watching and surfing the adults' sea of internet, it is still not that powerful to keep them in safe. Since it is not strange that the progressive and extremely creative art contents can not meet the socially recognized morale, we need some restrcition on the contents of art to keep our mental health.
The progressives will be very against this kind of restriction. However, we have reasons to pursuade them to make and create arts on their way only within the fence of their own society, where no body is againt them. |