Your Answer ▼ There might be contentious debates regarding the issue of whether it is necessary for the government to spend tax on teaching students science rather than other curriculums. The opponent might disagree with my stand. However, I strongly believe that we spend more bugets on teaching science rather than other subjects.
It is partially true that it is a little crutial to teach arts or athletics at school. Because every student has their own preference, and the personalities of students are really diverse. For example, some people are interested in music, drawing, and sports. However, instructing science more often at school can cause a negative effect on their school's life. In the end, they might feel science as a cumbersome and burden. Moreover, teaching arts or sports is a good way to reduce their stress. These days, most student do not have a spare time to take a break because they should go to academy to study Math, English after school.
As far as the other opinion is concerned, the later perspective should be emphasized more, and there are also the two compelling reasons. Firstly, In modern society, science technology is a main factor to develop country. With the advent of science innovation, we can make a lot of products that are very competitive to world. Also, we can promote these items by exporting to other countries. Hence, these products can bring out positive effect on nation' economy. Moreover, the students can upgrade their creativity through science curriculums at school. If students engage in those classes or experiments, they should think about principle of science every time, and imagine the outcome of experiments. Pondering on the aforementioned statements, it is more reasonable to take the latter view as the established opinion. In conclusion, although it is a little crucial for government to teach students arts or sports, I firmly believe that instructing students science is more important than other subjects |