Your Answer ▼
It has been stated that the government had been risen the
tax of private transportation in order to reducing the heavy traffic congestion
and invest the collected tax to the public transportation. While some insist
that it is a productive solution of killing two birds with one stone, others
assert that this solution did not take into account a pessimistic result that
it may produce. In this essay, the both perspectives will be discussed.
On one hand, it is certain that the new policy of the
government will exert a positive influence on reduced rate of new vehicle
purchasing. Buying a car is already considered as extravagant since it requires
high maintenance. For instance, to keep a personal vehicle, people are responsible
for regular paying for fuel, insurance charges, and even for occasional repairs
apart from installment payments for car itself. Likewise, for affording a car
is already enormous cost for people, the risen tax rate on private cars will be
of great help to reducing new purchaser of vehicles.
On the other hand, the new enforcement of the government
will cause difficult financial conditions of people who are rely their living on
vehicles. A huge part of people have jobs associated with cars, such as taxi or
truck drivers. As the government raises private car tax, it would be difficult
for them not to consider changing jobs. To illustrate, those types of occupations
are not great money-making. Some of them get by with day-to-day supplies. In
this aspect, the government's rate hike will have an unpleasant repercussion on
living of the employees in an economic way.
To sum up, the benefit
of the government's policy to reduce traffic congestion will bring about
effective less numbers of new vehicle purchasers, and the drawback will be that
some particular field of workers will face financial crisis due to the risen
tax. |