Your Answer ▼
There is a debate over the effectiveness of giving separate education programme for different students. Some say that studying together is the best way to make the best result while others say that different ability shall be treated differently. For the opinion of uni-education advocates’ point of view, it is somewhat sensible when we note the importance of the equal right to be educated properly. Students are born with different abilities. Some are gifted, others are need support. Thus, the equal educational chances to every people shall fill the gap of natural born abilities by systemic way. By adopting this uni-education system, a society can make our students and their parents heard the vocie that “regardless of the given ability, our society will compensate for it by securing the equal chance in class rooms” However, some people think differently. They strongly believe that special education is needed for the outstanding students. For their point of view, different educational programme is not the way of discrimination but the providing most suitable programmes for every students in school. Under scored students might fill the gap quickly by careful corrections from teachers while nicely scored students can have the chance to challenge more advanced tasks. By comparing both views above, we can reach to the conclusion. Institutionally, different students shall attend different class rooms. Forcing intelligent students to attend normal class is just abolishing their possibilities in their developmental period and opposite case is also the torture to the student who should endure the classes that cannot understand at all. Adding to that, by guaranteeing the movement between different level of educational programme according to the regular check up chances, we can also secure the hidden possibilities. By doing this, we can educate our future generation most effectively.
|