Your Answer ▼
It is true that the governments make
restrictions which cause people to experience discomfort in daily lives in
terms of their rights. I steadfastly believe that this system should be proceeded
because it can protect the organizations’ safety.
The governments’ implementation plays a role
as protection public from any dangers. Even though a problem is trivial for one
individual, if the problem gets worse, it can give detrimental impacts on the
overall society. For preventing potential matters, some extent of people’s
rights should be restricted. The social distance policy which blocks people to meet
together and moves up the stores and restaurants closing time for forbidding people’s
connections and interchanges in the Covid-19 pandemic period can be a specific example.
On top of that, having possibilities to incite
people’s movements and thoughts, person’s expression freedom should be suppressed.
Individual’s wrong information or exaggerated data can attract people’s minds,
causing social problems. For example, there was a situation that a food
youtuber introduced product with false information which derives the enterprise
to go at the verge of the bankrupt. Youtubers’ overuse and misuse of social
media instigate other users to criticize the company and make boycott on the
products. It was huge serious social problem. However, with appropriate authorities’
policy which gives limitations of their misconducts, the problems would not be
worse and even not occur.
In conclusion, I am convinced that it is undeniable
for governments to cease some extent of people’s freedom because it can prevent
potential problems which give harmful impacts on people and companies as well
as on the overall society. |