Your Answer ▼
Nowadays some people who underwent in jail become good public later, and there is an argument that teens talk to these people should talk to teens about the risk of committing a crime. However, I firmly disagree with this idea and for represent some reasons.
There is a likelihood that people who have been in prison commit a crime again even if they are good now by talking with teenagers. Although they never do that again, if If students encounter with these people, they could feel afraid. Actually, if I were a student and faced this situation, I think I would not attend the may did not attend this class or meeting because I would feel scared. People and I know that someone who stayed prison before become good and friendly citizen but we would have a little afraid feeling for them (앞에서 했던 말입니다. 참고로, 이런 비슷한 말들을 확 줄일 수 있어야 전체적인 시간 단축이 이루어질 수 있어요.). In this regard, it is a more better way that workers who know well in this filed like police or profiler talk to students about the ways to deter a crime.
Furthermore, as for ex-prisoner, they do not want to show their career about the crime. If they encounter a situation which they have to communicate with students about the dangers of committing a crime, maybe they are likely to be embarrassed. This is because they may know that people have a negative perspective for criminals, regardless of the scale of crime scale. Also we should need to keep their privacy. They are good now so we should not to deter for their lives.
In conclusion, despite the fact that some people who are criminals in the past become normal citizens, students would be able to feel scared and dangerous, and also criminals themselves they may could not want to face this situation in their mind. For these reasons, I do not fully support the above opinion.
48분 소요되었습니다.! 항상 감사합니다. |