Your Answer ▼
<Conflicting Argument about Teaching Art in Schools>
Many schools educate art as a regular subject nowadays. There
are the groups whose opinions are that it is good for
children to learn art at school. However, others say that it is meaningless for school
to teach art for their students children. Here are the reasons why both sides speak
out such arguments respectively below. Taking a stance that agrees to instruct art at school, art is good
for children's growth. However, the more passionate in academic
outcomes parents become like these days, the less opportunity to experience art field
children will have. Thinking that learning art is a waste of time
is caused because people are excessively concentrated on academic
enhancement of children. Not only academic study, but art also has
positive impact on the growth of children (너무 자주 쓰이고 있으므로 가끔씩은 대체해주세요!) because it allows children to express their imagination and release stress. In this way, art may effect
on the formation of personality, mental health of children and even
progress in academic study.
In contrast, people who disagree for children to learn art at
school think art cannot be good for study progress. Art is included in the
realm of play for children because they usually idle drawing something that
popped into their head very freely unless they are planning to major in art. This can never can be helpful to gain a higher academic for gaining
higher score, and it will make children feel more bored in study compared
with play such as art. The most important thing is to get great grade for
prospective success in school period, so art has to be prohibited at school. (금지해야한다와, 필수가 되어서는 안 된다는 전혀 다른 사항입니다. 그리고 논제를 고려했을 때 후자가 맞고요.)
Personally, I completely support the first opinion. It is also important to release stress when studying and school life that excessively biased to academic result may be felt as a desert, which is obviously not good for the delicate mind of children. |