Your Answer ▼
In today’s society, overpopulation is often prioritised to be solved. In this regard, it is often argued that their new homes should be built in the countryside. However, some people think that cities are the better place for them. I also agree with them and will discuss the reasons in this essay.
Actually, it will not be so effective to build many houses in the countryside. If the government wants to build them there, they should primarily advance public transport systems that can take that much population. In rural areas, they are not well developed, and the residents already suffer because of long commuting time. If homes are provided before solving transportation problems, it will worsen the existing problem.
Also, having homes and living in cities can improve the living standard of individuals. This is because they can benefit from governmental services near them. Governments are located in major cities, and this means that its services are much faster to get done when people get help from them. This convenience will be advantageous when it can help more people.
In conclusion, the government should provide more houses in cities than in countryside. This is because cities already have better transportation and governmental services that can immediately improve the life of many people. |