Your Answer ▼
While it is often said that animals seems to be used efficiently for the sake of profit for humans, others insist that this idea is incorrect. Personally, However, I would contend the former in my view.
To begin with, there are several reasons that some people might find animals are not beneficial for them. First of all, some species could have an negative influence to people who especially work at farms. For instance, inhabiting animals close to crop areas can destroy destruct and spoil a lot of crops that were brought up by farmers. They can even make many people who live in rural areas injured and damaged by crashing or bumping into them. Next, a few species that have a bacteria living on in their body can infect some diseases to humans, resulting in an epidemic. Thus, people who do not have an immunity which can fight against diseases can be exposed to fatal risk due to infection from animals. (이 문단은 표현상의 문제는 그리 많지 않지만, 내용상 싹 바뀌어야 합니다. 이에 대해서는 총평에서 말씀드리겠습니다.)
On the other hand, some people consider creatures as bringing profits to them. Firstly, by exploiting many animals in wildlife and locking them up in cage like zoos where many people can experience watching animals, those who supervise them can earn a money through selling a ticket that allows people to see around species. In addition, humans do not have to waste their life as well as can develop technology in biology through animal testing. Testing itself could be used to test creatures such as mammals, birds, and fishes, which brings about valuable advantages (어떠한 장점인지 적어주시면 더 확실한 글이 됩니다.) to people.
In conclusion, even though using animals can be detrimental for humans, it is clear that the behaviours have been offering helpful effect to people. Hence, species are likely to continue to affect humans in useful aspects.
(Word count : 288) |