In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? |
답안 As the population grows, more and more people want new homes to live in, but the space for the building is available in the countryside in many cases. Some assert that protecting the countryside from the development is more important. I agree with this opinion and I will further outline my view below. First of all, the countryside is also a home for numerous creatures. I believe that mankind is not the only creature on Earth. Human is just one kind of diverse species so that we do not have the right to evade other animals' habitat. If we develop the countryside due to the lack of living places, it can harm the environment critically. At length, the damaged ecosystem will destroy human's life as a result of the selfishness of the human. According to one study, scientists argue that only one kind of animal in nature can dramatically affect the whole species including mankind. Secondly, building new houses in the countryside is a consequence of narrow-sight thinking of city planners, or of greedy capitalists who want to make fortune by construction. To my mind, if necessary, we can develop enough places in the city, not in the countryside. Since the high technology of construction has advanced, it is possible to build extremely high buildings. Additionally, we can demolish old low-stories houses and rebuild a new one which has many homes to live in. In this way, there is no need to build new habitats in the countryside. In conclusion, preserving the countryside should be a top priority than developing the area because nature is a generous home for all, not only for humans. I strongly believe that the growing population still can live in a city with great achievements in the field of construction. |
제가 아직 주장+근거+구체화 하는 연습을 제대로 안해서 많이 부족한 글이에요. 뼈때리는 첨삭과 예상점수 부탁드립니다! 감사해요.