Your Answer ▼
It has been argued that some Some people think that it is not a problem at all to replace the old buildings with modern architecture. However, I strongly disagree with this point of view.
To begin with, traditional buildings, nowadays, have been destroyed due to the development of technology to make new ones. It it is absurd to argue that old architecture should be knocked down. In other words, we should maintain the position to preserve our traditional house no matter how long they have been located in, because it will be one of our precious resources to hand down to your (2인칭은 구어에 해당하므로 따로 쓰지 않는다고 생각하셔도 됩니다. 또한, 그걸 떠나서 앞의 인칭과 통일이 되지도 않았고요.)children in the future. Furthermore, with the conservation of them, tons of (전형적인 구어입니다.) young kids will be able to learn a lot of information from the old version, such as the culture of prehistoric and ancient human characteristics. It would play a key role in creating individuals’ lives afterward. With a cutting-edge style, making an unusual construction is absolutely a good idea, even though, lots of treasure culture heritage has been destroyed has been gotten rid of to make the modern house, which is the worst opinion. For instance, one of the old building, which is called Namwon palace locating in a rural area in Korea, the government is trying to remove the Namwon Palace it as soon as possible so that they can change into the new land with a large apartment village. I suppose that it will be completely one of the miserable methods in modern life. Individuals need to have caution and awareness about that the importance of the preservation of the being original. In conclusion, although it is crucial to make a creation an unusual architecture, protecting the traditional culture for the younger people must be more valuable later on.
안녕하세요:) 글자수는 285, 시간은 40분걸렸습니다. 최소목표점수는 6.5입니다! 감사합니다:) |