It is a common belief that having not children (정확하게 써주셔야 합니다. 아이를 갖지 않는 사람들의 감소라고 적어주셔야 해요.) may affect on society negetively. However, there is a more persuasive argument that the trend of deciding not to have children has positive development in the long run.
On the one hand, not having children in one society leads to labor shortage. We need more young people to work in various industries such as service, medical care and IT sector, etc to boost economic growth. Incresasing short labor cause problems to misplace appropriate workforces because of not having engough human resources. (여기는 어떤 의미로 적어주셨나요? 댓글 주시면 확인하고 수정해드리겠습니다.) For example, reserachers of recent study warned that shortage of population is serious social issue in 30 years and we will even hard to find people who work for daycare or medical care which is compulsory for the people who really needs their help. Likewise, the decreasing population can affect not having population affect on people's everyday lives and they experience inconvenience.
Nevertheless, reduction of birth rate can make children to have more beneficial oppotutines in education as well as in their lives. With limited fund of each household, parents can allocate certain amount of money to spend to their children, If there are many children in one household, each child have limited chance to study and take part in extra curriculars. (문장이 길어지면 무조건 손해본다고 생각하셔야 합니다. 최대한 짧게 끊어가주세요!) For example, only child can try several extracurricular activies such as piano, flute and violin for music and taekwonndo or swimming for physical education. In case of having more siblings, she or he will be deprived of having changes to experience those when they are young.
To sum up, while there are some disavantages not to having children, it is evident that the advantages of not having many children far outweigh the drawbacks. |