Your Answer ▼
It is small wonder that studying history at school is one of the most vital subjects at school factors. However, there is a more persuasive argument that learning science and technology is more imperative than being taught history nowadays because those who live in countries with advanced science and technology tend to have lots of benefits such as instinct-gratification and security.
On the one hand, proponents who have a priority on studying history insist that people can avoid repeating the same faults by experimenting with adverse events that happened in the past. In other words, this prevents This helps prevent people from wasting resources such as money and time. Another convincing reason is that history encourages people to be proud by forming their identity which means where they were from and what their root was. It would be essential for people to play an autonomous role as a member of society.
Nevertheless, it seems short-sighted to contend that history subject is more beneficial than science and technology in school. People have a preposition to pursue a better lifestyle and want to live in an environment with something new. In this regard, science and technology can satisfy human's innate instincts. To exemplify, the vehicles enable people to move more fast and comfortable and dams also allow human to use water anytime or anywhere we want. Moreover, the more the nation's technology develops, the stronger the country's military becomes is. It means that countries with advanced science can create more powerful weapons like nuclear which ensure their citizen's security.
Bottom line, while it is apparent that concentrating on history subject at school primarily is vital to students since it can prohibit them from making the same mistakes and it gives them identity, it is undeniable that science and technology are more imperative subjects because it guarantees their safety and contentment of fundamental instinct of mankind. |