▶ Your Answer :
There is an argument about what lesson is
more beneficial for students. Academic or practical? Both subjects bring
advantages to the learner, but I believe that an academic lesson is more suitable for
students to teach them at schools.
It is true that today many parents and
schools may emphasize on merits of teaching practical subjects to students unlike the past. <(why?/what are the merits?) In general, learners were taught subjects that merely related
to theoretical knowledge such as history, science and so forth. However, the
teaching way has been changed as many people realized that how much practical
lesson is important. For instance, unless people learn how to manage the bank account
and to cook properly, putting theory into brain is unnecessary. Because when
students graduate schools they will come across a variety of practical requirements. <(sentence fragment) Consequently, without learning some practical subjects people cannot adapt to
do some daily basic requirements.
On the other hand, learning academic
subjects is still significant in our lives. It is clear that most people learn
principle subjects when they are in schools. They absorb the knowledge naturally
about cultures, physics and linguistic subjects as education is focusing on
teaching those things which are compulsory. In addition, students who study
hard on theoretical subjects they can improve academic results and finally it
will help with to future career opportunities. That is the reason why still many
people contribute to learn academic subjects rather than practical ones which can
be taught at home easily.
In conclusion, in my opinion, practical
learning can be taught at home such as cooking or car maintenance. Acquiring academic
knowledge in school is more valuable as people can have better future possibilities on
getting jobs.
Score: 7 Comment: 잘 서술 해주셨습니다. 글 정리를 조금 더 해주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 또한 내용을 조금 더 왜 practical subjects가 더 필요한지 또는 왜 academic subjects가 더 필요한지에 대해 focus를 해주시면 더 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고 하셨습니다.
|