▶ Your Answer :
There
is overwhelming evidence that the world is becoming increasingly globalised and
advanced, affecting all sphere of human lives, including the one of global
travelling. As the price of airfare is getting lower, many nations have
developed their travel industries into primary sectors of their economies.
Recently, there has been an ongoing heated debate over the relative
effectiveness of this phenomenon. In this essay, both sides of this issue will
be analysed with some applicable supports.
To
begin with, undeniably, there are significant virtues that tourism brings to a
country. Firstly, a flourishing tourist industry means growing needs for a
variety of services, such as hotels, transport, restaurants and entertainment,
resulting in a considerable number of new jobs, when are created for those who
lack tertiary qualifications. Secondly, it seriously contributes to the
development of infrastructure, namely roads, water and electricity, to accommodate
visitors. Moreover, it leads to cultural preservation, since tourists visit a
particular place to try its authentic cuisine, to partake in national
festivals, or to see its unique natural landscapes. Lastly, foreign exchange
can help to generate resources to import food, pharmaceuticals, technology and
consumer goods.
Be that as it may, while this may be true to some extent, it does not mean that
this trend is flawless. To elaborate, a country may suffer from cultural
destruction, particularly freezing a culture, losing its peculiarities,
changing local’s lifestyles, customs and even a language in order to more
effectively serve visitors, or being in influenced by foreigners. This can
cause stress in a traditional society and even lead to animosity toward tourists. Finally, sometimes, tourism is associated with the appearance
of illegal economic activities and delinquency, for example, drug trade,
prostitutions or gambling.
To
recapitulate, as international travelling is inevitable, its numerous benefits
should be fortified, with its detrimental sides being wisely reduced by
supporting the traditional legacy and not promoting the activities that could
threaten a community’s stability and safety.
|