Third world countries need help from the international community. Some people prefer financial aid while others think practical aid and advice are better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is controversial that undeveloped nations should be
aided through financial methods. People insist that what they need most is fund
itself, not practical items. However, there is a more persuasive argument that
foods or goods are more suitable because those can be distributed to the
citizens who truly need them.
On the one hand, third world countries usually run out
of budget, so they ask other countries for financial help. This measure has one
main advantage that money can be utilized for various reasons depending on the
facing issues of the undeveloped countries. Furthermore, dollars might be used
for importing products such as IT devices or oil from developed nations such as
USA or Arabic countries, so that it would be beneficial to other rich nations.
Nevertheless, I reckon foods or medical services are more proper helps for the countries which are in poverty. If they get aid as a form of fund, it can be used only for politicians or leaders of the nations whereas I believe every people should benefit. Accordingly, it would induce or worsen polarization of the economy. Moreover, since they are in desperate situation, it is possible that they spend money to research nuclear weapons as an example of North Korea. In fact, North Korea is often blamed by UN for its nuclear experiments utilizing relief funds from South Korea.
To summarize, even though relief money can be a way of
helping third world nations, it is appropriate to lend a hand to them by other
pragmatic ways concerning misusing of the money.