▶ Your Answer : In recent years, there is an ongoing heated debate on the governmental supports of people's disease, affecting the lowering of the burden of the sick in the contemprary world. People argue what the most important helps, whether prevention is or treatment is. In this essay, I will pose both sides of this phenomenon and my stance with some applicalble supports. To begin with, there are various reasons to focus on the prevention and change of life style toward reducing the number of getting sick. Firstly, it is definitely easy to do some behaviours which protect themselves, although it also is a tiredsome work. To elaborate, only to wash hands before and after touching outside things or coming back at home will be a far powerful preventional method, which was reported by WHO. Furthermore, now many people are interested in their well-being lives, as the modern society is growing over living standards. Hence, if governments show adn advertise about the simple prevention way of diseases like vaccinations to public, people can figure out what they have to do. Lastly, on an economical level, there are many statistics on the moeny efficiency of prevention rather than the cure of diseases. Be that as it may, others say the necessity of governmental supports regards treatments after got sick. In other words, the government's financial aids should apply for patients who do not have ablility to pay for their hospital. A number of people are under financial difficulties, since the high cose of long-term admission or expensive medicines, when patients cannot work due to sickness. In addition, the families of a patient need a help including money supports to live themselves and psychological helps which are about depression and anxiety. To recapitulate, taking into account both sets of argument, I believe that supports is needed on both sides, but before illness, if government endeavor more to change people's perception to prevent diseases, the number of sick people will dramatically reduce. |