Your Answer ▼ It has been an enigmatic quandar as to wheather whether the goverments government can infringe on people’s freedom for the safety of communite community. However, it is clear that the goverment can infringe people’s freedom. The scope and breadth of protection from damage and make making sure that safety regulations are followed are two paragons the reverberate such a theme.To begin with the protection from damage lucidly illustrate the issue at hand on morden society in which almost all people using public traffic like bus, subway and airplane. Whe When people using use that, they infringe their’s freedom, because some one’s unexpested unexpected behavior can lead to serious accidents. For example, when we take a plane we must turn aff off our mobile phone, and never bring liquids type like alchol into the plane. Inaddtional Additionally it is esstional, when we ride bus, we must took handle or seated in the chair. This protectio protection from damage is obviously demonstrates on epitome of why
Furthermore make making sure that safety regulation indubitably explains the matter pertaining to this theme. Soem certain jobs can endanger people’s lives such as school driver, pilots, nurse and doctor. They should have some medical check up whether they like it or not. Throug Through These process, some people might be violated their own freedom but checking is necessary. because they can determine the lives of many people. In the same vein, whem when student entrance the dormitary like accomodation, they must take a blood test and get an infections diease vaccine because this make sure that safety regulation explicity depicts that the goverment take awqy away people’s freedom.
At first glance a non-democratic way may seem like coercive and a non-democratic way but the examples of protection from damgae and make making sure that safety regulations coherently prove that the goverment infringe people’s freedom |