Your Answer ▼ As numerous subjects are being taught in universities, controversy exists among people who believe that theoretical subjects are considerably less practical than practical subjects, hence universities should concentrate more on practical areas. Although the claim is relevant, I will discuss that theoretical subjects are equally important as practical subjects and why they shouldn't be disregarded by universities.
It is an undeniable truth that practical subjects graduates are more immediately applied to the world. As students who studied practical subjects have already mastered the demanded skills during their study period at the university, they are fully able to contribute to the industry. For example, civil engineering graduates are totally capable of being transferred to construction sites and work.
On the other hand, students who study theoretical subjects, such as physics, have comparatively less contribution to the industry shortly after graduation. However, this is a misconception because practical subjects consist of mostly theoretical methodologies. Theoretical subjects build up the fundamentals of all practical subjects, hence, practices cannot exist without theories. As an example, factories and machines cannot be built without physicians who studied theoretical physics. Although theoretical subjects do not have immediate contributive aspects, they are extremely important to all subjects.
To conclude, it may seem like for some people that theoretical subjects are not applicable to real world scenarios. However, the truth is all practical areas are made out of theories. Therefore, theoretical subjects taught in universities are equivalently important as practical subjects, hence neither subject should be prioritised. |