▶ Your Answer :
These days, many experts have debatable opinions about a university’s role of what do they teach for students. Some insist that a university provides practical skills and knowledge for using in their future workplace, but others argue that a university should lead students to access to the knowledge for its own sake not regarding whether the course is useful to an employer.
First of all, I strongly believe that a university is the organization to improve students’ literature knowledge and pure curiosity, it means this organization is not a commercial institute. This is because that the relationship between professors and students are exist only for study of their subject. Professors lead students to develop their sight and think by teaching a professional researches and literacy. If a university provides the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace, it will change a university’s radical purpose that making students be more mature and improving their pure curiosity about study. Therefore, it is apparent that a university would lead students by teaching their own learning.
Moreover, work skills needed in the workplace can learn enough when they begin their job. The work skills are fundamentally different. Even if students learn skills from a university, these will not the same as what they actually use in their job. According to a recent research from South Korea, people who got the skills from a university about how to act in their workplace, can not adjust in their colleagues and work environment. They are surveyed the knowledge learned from a university is essentially different with workplace’s. It is evident that skills and knowledge from the workplace can not get from a university.
To conclude, I definitely perceive that a university is the organization to study how to learning, not to teach commercial skills. The true function of a university is to arouse pure desire about study. |