Your Answer ▼ There are two conflicting views toward the issue of young people fitting into a crucial position in the government. Some argue that young people should not be encouraged to be in the important place in the government while other says it would bring beneficial results. The advocates for the former contention believe that the young politicians would not be able to contribute to giving an enhancement as when playing a critical role in the government. It is due to a common belief that people with in a relatively young age do not know about the principle of society in a profound level. In fact, it is true that it would be hard for them to have a wisdom and knowledge that come from the age which can function as a mean to seek the best solution that is needed for a nation. On the other hand, the people who opine a counterarguement say that it will be a good for everyone if there are more young people in the government who have ability to discern exactly what the urgent problem is in modern society. Since every factor of a country changes so quickly in current society, there is a need for people from new generation to be politicians with the view to implement the policy in a more pragmatic way with a different point of view. In fact, I once saw an Korean article titled 'The need for a new perspective of the government', addressing problems of government's legislation that cater for only old days in Korea. (단순히 새로운 관점에서 끝나는 것이 아니라, 여기서 젊은 세대를 끌어넣어주세요~) All in all, I think that young people have to be encouraged to have a important role in government due to the need for various standing points. However, I also content that a striking balance between horizons of old and modern within the government is the most important. *만약에 topic이 some say @, to what extent do you agree 인데 서론에서 some say A, others say @ 라고 해도 무관하나요 ? 항상 수고해주셔서 정말 감사합니당
A: 네 예외가 있긴 하지만 기본적으로는 되긴 합니다. 그러나 이때 A, 즉 @와 반대되는 사항을 최대한 정확하게 설정해야 해요 :)
|