The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people assert that to preserve our planet, the increased cost is by far the most important measure to deter pollution. However, I acknowledge somewhat with this idea but additional methods should be considered equally with fares.
First of all, it is undeniable that the myriad of fuels is now threaten the whole world by personal vehicles and transportation. Moreover, the number of drivers is rapidly growing and most citizens have obsessions regarding the convenience of driving a car rather than on foot or by bicycle. Increasing the costs of fuels might reduce the population who drive a personal car, which emits detrimental materials to the atmosphere and ground. However, it does not mean that pollution will incredibly be curtailed because we, on a daily basis, have to use transportation such as buses, subway, train, and aircraft.
Secondly, the aforementioned is not a fundamental way to solve severe environmental issues. Undoubtedly, there are diverse reasons for pollution. For instance, equipment, devices, and even fertilizers for agricultural use as well as many industrial factories pollute our planet. The government should implement forceful policies so that companies can reward subsidies by attending the use of eco-friendly ingredients and components. Conversely, companies or people who make irrevocable phenomenon to the environment, the government can enforce the relevant laws for them to pay penalties.
To sum up, the enhanced costs of fuels are not the only way to prevent the environment. To eradicate fatal pollution, owing to the causes of the environmental problems are tremendous and complicated, the government and local councils should enact powerful rules and allocate budget for companies simultaneously with regulating the price of fuels.
목표점수: 7점 (academic)
걸린시간: 45분
하고픈말: 감사합니다 :)