Your Answer ▼ Most of people would agree with the opinion that young people should be required to have full time educaiton until they are at least 18 tears old. But I totally disagree with that. Young people should have a lots of opportunity to have numorous experience our of the school, instead of having full time education until they got aged. First of all, school cannot teach everything in our normal life. We usually be teached the theorical education in school, for 12-13 years. Of course we can learn a lots of things from our first social place, school. For example, between friends we could learn how to treat a lots of charateristics, and a lots of basic etiqutte to live in community. However, that only make us feel new and helpful till 13-14 years old. Older students have to get another experienced at out of school. Like, they can learn how to treat customer in restaurant and they can learn how ca n be speacialized to fishing at the sea. full time eduation disrupting that. Second, in the world, there's a lots of jobs which doesn't need the knowledge from full time education. For example, farmer doesn't need to know about the high level of grammar or trigonometry. Also the barista. One future scholar claimed for Korean education system that dirves all students in school for whole day, korean students wasting their whole time to learn the knowledge would'nt be helpful for them and the job wouldn't be exist. The last reason is in the near future, we don't need a lots of knowledge which is not in our area. For example, in near past, the simultaneous translator has been invented. From that inventation, we don't need to learn other languages that we don't need to use in normal lives. Also, the chat GPT has found the inflammation on human teeth with the x-ray picture. That gaves a lots of doctors panniced because, that means from now on, we don't need the specailist for high price, but the chat GPT for cheap pice. In near future, students would not need to learn helpless information for thier lives |