The lecturer says that the reading is fiction than history. (This is bit unclear) This refutes the reading that Chinese had already explored America before Columbus arrived in 1492.
First of all, the professor argues that an old Chinese map is fake. (Clearly state its opinion) To be specific, the fact that the map was made later. And the forgery used for supporting the theory. (Wrong sentence, Hard to get the meaning) This contradicts the reading that there is an the old Chinese map that shows how the world appeared in 1418.
Second, the lecturer claims that the presence of pre-Columbian Chinese artifacts does not prove that the Chinese discovered North America before Columbus. If Chinese had discovered North America, they might have made marks obviously like Viking. And coin and bead does not prove the presence. (Presence of what?) This contradicts the reading that the artifacts proves that the Chinese discovered North America before Columbus.
Last, the lecturer argues that a lacquering method is just coincidence. (For what?) For example, pyramid does not mean there was contact with foreign country.(Why is pyramid mentioned?) This refutes the reading that a traditional Chinese lacquering technique was in use in Mexico prior to Columbus' arrival.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence |
점수 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Score | Limited 9-13 |
- 통합형에서는 각 thesis에서 lecturer의 main point가 드러나 있어야 하며, 근거로써 설명을 충분히 해주셔야 합니다. 세세한 내용이 부족하고, 논지가 unclear합니다. |