▶ Your Answer :
Some people may argue that government should provide money to be beautiful rather than to be practical. However, I have a different idea. I think government should invest in practical.
First of all, in order to people’s security, government should spend money to be practical. Nowadays, in Korea, many buildings have been constructed in all cities. These buildings are looked like beautiful and nice, but actually have problems of safety. There are lack regulation and management of buildings, because the building administrators have to manage on a tight budget, so they spend lots of money for exterior rather than secure in order to attract public attention. This is why people suffer from feeling insecure. For example, in my city, there were no earthquake frequently, so almost all buildings were constructed without earthquake resistant design. In last year, the earthquake was occurred and many people were damaged. Only then people knew the importance of secure. If government invested in constructing of buildings for people, it would not be occurred.
Also, in order to be fair for all people, government have to spend money to promote the welfare rather than urban landscaping. In other words, investing in public transportation or national welfare makes people live better environment than spending money to landscaping. By supporting of public transportation, many people are able to save money and they are not faced with economical difficulties. For instance, the government in my country conducted a public opinion poll to ask about what do you think about investing in public transportation. The result was that national people totally wanted to it. This is because, a train or a bus cost was too high, so many people lived on a tight budget. Supporting of government made people not to face financial difficulties.
To sum up, government should spend money to be practical rather than to be beautiful because government has to be fair for more people and effort for secure of nations. |