■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
Hackers_Actural test Writing_2nd edition_test02 입니다! In the listening, the lecturer casts doubt
on the reading’s argument that there are three plausible theoires to explain
the transient lunar phenomenan. He maintains that this reading’s claim is
somewhat errneous, less convincing, and quite invalid, saying that no one can
be positive whith this assumption in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading insists that this
is due to the gases beneath the surface of the Moo. However, the professor,
refutes that argument by stating that gases are unlikely responsible to TLPs.
This is mainly because gases usually noticed so this is just conicidence. The
second point, the author makes is that paticles from space strike the Moon’s
surface and result in TLPs. To rebute this claim, the speaker asserts that dusk
cloud is huge but it is never detected. It means, particles from space are not
main cause. Moreover, there are a little dusk floating around, Finally, the
author contend this this phenomenan is mainly because of the solar radiation.
In contrast, the speaker disputes the claim by saying that data of solar flare
is not perfectly matched with TLPs. To be more specific, sometimes it is
matched up but more often it didn’t.
Therefore, the lecturer conclude that the
theories suggested by the author are too proposterous to get legitimacy.
한가지만 더 여쭤봐도 되나요ㅜㅜ 혼자공부하고있는 학생이라ㅠㅠ
통합형 작성시, 보기에 주어진 글을 그대로 적는 것 보다 제가 조금
바꿔 적는게 더 좋을까요?
■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|