▶
Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker
contends that sucralose is not hazardous to human
health. This contradicts the reading passage's assertion that sucralose
shoud be banned because it has potential harmful
effects. (causes the health issues.)
To begin with, the lecturer
says that the claim that sucralose producing
insulin does not mean anything. To be specific, there are different substances
with similar results such as rice or potato, but it is obvious that these
substances cause diabetes. This refutes the
reading passage's point that people who consume surcralose are more likely to
have a risk of developing diabetes.
Second, the speaker claims
that sucralose actually does not produce harmful substances when used for
cooking. The reason is, according to a laboratory test, toxic compounds were not found in the
food that contained (with) sucralose.
Therefore, it cannot cause health problems such as cancer. This casts doubt on
the reading passage's claim that sucralose produces toxic compounds when used
for cooking.
Third, the lecturer asserts
that the claim that sucralose causes intense allergic reactions has no
evidence. This is due to the fact that those claims are unreliable. People hear
it from the media, and tend to believe that they have similar symptoms even if they do not. Also, a study on the safety of sucralose consumption does not
indicate any of those symptoms. This challenges the reading passage's point
that sucralose can set off intense allergic reactions.
Writing Score
(0-30): 25-27
Score (0-5):
4.00-4.25
Grammar &
Feedback: 내용 정리 잘 하셨습니다.
전치사, 시제 및 몇몇 문법 오류에만 주의 하시면 더 좋은 점수 기대해 볼 수 있을 것
같습니다. 수고하셨어요.
|