▶ Your Answer :
The reading and the lecture both
talks about whether the Entruscans originated origenated
from Turkey. According to the reading, it is said that DNA researched by
Italian researcher proves that Etruscans are derived from ancient Turks.
However, the professor in the lecture is of opinion that analyzed 2400 remains
does not support that contention d. He
also keep on his idea that examination were executed so old that of most cases
are decayed and contaminated.
Second, the author asserts that the
language widely adopted by the Etruscan shows that there have been close
linkage between Entruscans and Turkish based on studies and discoveries
indicating comparatives to Indo-Eupropeans. This cast doubts on the readings's
arguement that it is unrelated among two languages
lanuages, since alphabet cannot be the
sufficient material to connect them. Also, it is overestimated to define same
family so as to subsisting member.
Lastly, the reading's claim is that shared funeral rituals support the
inter-relation of the two races. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebukes that there
is no connection to maintain although succedors are from northern
Italy and succedors.
Fair (17-23)
첫번째 본문 -철자 오류. originated -contend 동사입니다. 여기서는 그 주장 의 명사형이므로 contention으로 써주세요. 두번째 본문 -철자 오류. languages -철자 오류. alphabet
세번째 본문 -파란 부분 이해하기 어렵습니다. 내용 정리 전체적으로 짜임새가 부족합니다. 메인 포인트를 잘 짚어주시는 것이 중요합니다. 또한, 철자 오류 많습니다. 개선해주세요. 또한, 마지막 본문은 전체적으로 이해가 어렵습니다. 표현력을 기르셔야 본인이 전달하고자 하는 바를 명확히 전달하실 수 있습니다.
수고하셨습니다~~
|