▶ Your Answer : As far as the Little Ice Age is concerned, the lecturer takes a stand (that opposes) against (가 더 간결) the thesis of the reading and presents three counterarguments. Specifically, the lecturer does not sympathize with the reading's view and argues that new theories can replace the old fashined viewpoint. In the first place, the lecturer points out that the cold Gulf Stream affects only the regions of Europe and North America. However, the Little Ice Age had influence on South hemisphere such as New Zealand and South Africa as well. This point tarnishes the impact of the reading that the Gulf Stream recieving cold freshwater is responsible for the Little Ice Age. Secondly, the speaker goes on to say that the impacts of the volanic volcanic eruption could not visually appear. This is attributed to the reason that there was no report regarding any volcanic effect. This directly contradicts the reading that the Little Ice Age took place due to insufficient sunlight blocked by volcanic byproducts.
Last but not least, the lecturer concludes by saying that the time period of the Little Ice Age does not match the speed of the population change. The variation in human population occured for relatively a short amount of time, whereas the Little Ice Age lasted 550 years. This casts doubt on the reading that the decreasing number of human population might caused the lower temparature change during that period.
Writing score(0-30): 27-29 Score: 4.25-4.75 Grammar: 문법 아주 좋지만 시제에 조금 만 더 신경 쓰시면 더 완벽 해 질 것 같아요. Feedback: 어휘의 사용이 풍부하고 이해 하기 쉽게 잘 쓰셨습니다. 다만 reading 이라는 단어가 많이 사용되니 passage 같은 유의어로 몇개는 바꿔 쓰시면 더 좋을 것 같아요. 수고 하셨습니다. |