▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage claims
that the school shouldn't compel students to do community service. However, the
lecturer sees compulsory community service positively, and refutes the
passage in three ways.
First
of all, the lecturer suggests that schools can successfully assess student's
voluntary works. He says that many schools
have their own community service plans and evaluation criteria. This
contradicts the reading passage's statement that schools cannot provide fair
evaluation program for student's community service.
Next,
the professor insists that even if students are forced to do the services, they
can still learn valuable lessons. He
explains that a student’s volunteering experience may inspire
him or her to be a doctor in the future. (served at the hospital may
have lessons from that experience and be a doctor.) As such, while the reading
passage contended that students will perceive
community service in a distorted way, the lecturer opposes it by arguing that
mandatory services can still be valuable.
(give values.)
Finally,
the lecturer states that most of the systems of school didn't get approvals
from students regarding community service.
The reading passage stressed that compulsory volunteering works are abusing
student's right, but the professor argues that other systems such as homework
and attendance are also compelling the
students, so community service is just another case of those mandates.
In
conclusion, the lecturer disagrees with the reading passage's main statement
that community service should not be included in school curriculum.
Writing
Score (0-30): 21-22
Score
(0-5): 3.25-3.50
Grammar
& Feedback: 스펠링
실수 같은 너무 기본적인 실수는 꼭 피하도록 노력 하세요. 단어 철자 틀린 것이 몇 개 있었습니다. 몇 가지 문법적인 오류 제외하고는 내용정리 잘 하셨어요. 수고하셨습니다.