■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that wave-energy facilities as an alternative energy will be increasingly common in the future because of their many advantages. On the other hand, the lecture brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First, the speaker argues that the use of wave energy is not constant. It has a technical problem, which happens in a harsh marine environment. It is not appropriate to use wave energy in ocean. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that wave farms are fairly reliable generators of power due to the traits of being constant and predictable.
Second, according to the lecture, floating convertors plays (주어 동사 일치) a negative role in ecosystem. They have contain harmful chemicals. It is highly likelihood likely to leak heavy toxic chemicals into the ocean especially when they are moving freely. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that wave-energy plants are environmentally friendly because they don't emit harmful gases and other pollutants and isn't risky.
The final point made by the lecture is that wave farms are highly visible because of bright colors. This counters the reading passage's argument that wave-power convertors are small and floating on the surface of water, so that they will not be noticeable to anyone.
|
|
점수: 23/30
전체적으로 분량이 너무 적습니다. 특히 마지막 문단은 2문장밖에 없는데...
바디는 기본적으로 5문장 이상 있으면 좋습니다.
다음부터는 더 많이 쓰려고 연습하시면 좋을 것 같아요.
문법 오류가 몇가지 있습니다. toxic은 형용사이기때문에 반드시 뒤에 명사가 와야합니다.
주어 동사 일치도 잘 봐주세요. 주어가 복수라 s가 붙으면 plays가 아닌 play가 와야합니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*