▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem mere exciting and glamorous than it really was. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. to contradict the argument
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the point in the reading passage's claim that Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money. This attributed to the fact that he borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. but this doesn't mean that he was poor but this does not prove he was rich. When he ran out of money, he borrowed Swiss merchant's money while he was waiting for his money. Thus this counters the reading passage's claim that he wasn' wealthy. he was not rich
Secondly, the lecturer casts doubt on the point made by reading the passage's claim that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately because it was written many years after the conversation occurred. It is obvious that the famous writer Voltaire wrote the particular night conversation. Consequently, this refutes the reading passage's claim that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations held many years earlier.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the point made by reading passage's claim that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. Because even more powerful prisoners were not able to bribe. As a result, with such reasoning, This opposes the reading passage’s claim that Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |