The lecturer argues that there is
evidence that the Amazon supported a large civilization. The reading passage’s arguments are totally opposite from lecturer’s
claim.
First, the
reading insists that the jungle of Amazon rain forest prevented the formation
of a huge civilization. The professor refutes that argument by saying that
archeologists investigated Amazon by satellite which observe roads and canals
connected to town and village. It proved Amazon
people worked together. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim
that a civilization could not be formed because of the dense jungle.
Next, the
author maintains that the artifacts in Amazon lack sophistication. In contrast,
the lecturer counters the contention by stating that there are abundance of
advanced pottery. Also, there are many ceramic urns, vases, and bowls which cannot can’t be made by lower technique. Even they are sophisticated. This counters the
reading passage’s claim that ancient items found in Amazon are not
sophisticated.
Finally, the article contends that European expeditions proved that
there was no large civilization. The speaker rebuts this statement by giving
reason that there was so vast. To be more specific, the size of civilization
ground was almost 5km^2. It means that there probably exist much remains which
is unexplored. Plus, Jjungle obscures entire cities. This refutes the reading passage’s
claim that European expeditions showed that there was no large society in the
Amazon.
Good (24)
첫번째 본문
-connected to/ 무엇에 연결되었는지를 표현하기위한 전치사 to를 꼭 써주세요.
두번째 본문
-can't 축약형 지양해주세요. cannot
-파란 부분 이해하기 어렵습니다.
세번째 본문
-대소문자 오류 Jungle-->jungle
-jungle 단수 명사이므로 obscure-->obscures 로 써주세요.
문법/표현 개선해주세요. 내용도 불필요한 내용 넣지 마시고, 내용 숙지 충분히 하시고 써주세요. 글이 모호해집니다.
수고하셨습니다~~