▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the
professor made several points about productivity and rewards. The professor
argues that the reward system does not work to motivate and enhance the productivity of the workers. However, the author
of the passage contends that whenever the good behavior in work is rewarded,
it is and repeated,
and thus the productivity is increased increases. The professor's lecture casts doubt on the
reading by using a number of points that are contrary to the main idea of the reading that the incentive to the a good work improves the productivity of workers.
The first point that the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that a
reward can be a punishment. According to the professor, the incentive to the
a good work by a payment can make the
people feel manipulated and not respected. This point that the reward can be a
punishment differs from the reading in that the reading states that promise of
incentives improves the employee's attitude,
motivation, and productivity. Now, the point made by the professor casts doubt
on the reading because while the professor maintains that the reward for a good
work can be a punishment to the workers, the reading claims that it actually
improves the productivity of the workers.
Another point that the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that a
reward to a good work can reduce the quality of work and the workers'
productivity. The professor claims that giving incentives to the workers for a nice work can make the workers to
conceal their mistakes to avoid getting negative ratings by the supervisor, and
this can lead to ruining the relationship between the workers and their
supervisors, which also ruins the productivity of the workers. However, the
reading states that incentives must have high
perceived values to employees and that it must be perceived to be within reach of
the workers so that they will strive to earn it. This point is contradicted by
the professor’s point that the reward to good work can make the quality of work
and the workers’ productivity to decline.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture
contrast the reading. The argument of the professor that incentives can reduce the quality of work and that it can be a
punishment to the workers demonstrate that the argument of the reading, that
when the good work is rewarded, it is repeated, is in doubt.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
20 |
Overall
Comment: |
Good! 두 입장을 잘
비교하셨어요. 하지만 문법 오류가 많고, 글이 전체적으로 깁니다. 보통 통합형은 3가지 사항을 다루는데, 작성자님이 다루신 사항들은 총
2개입니다. 추가적으로 통합형에는 결론을 굳이 넣지 않아도 괜찮아요. |
|
|